Journal of Allbiosolution adheres to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Core Practices and the COPE et al. (2022) Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.
Everyone involved in the journal, author, reviewer, editor, and publisher, is responsible for maintaining these ethical standards:
- No data fabrication and falsification and/or image manipulation.
- No plagiarism. Publish original work.
- No submission of the same article in several scientific journals concurrently and/or redundant and/or similar publications based on the same experimental data.
- All authors must have made substantial contributions and approved the final manuscript. Author order and contributions should be agreed upon before submission, and any addition or removal of authors after submission must be approved by all authors.
- Proper acknowledgement and/or permission.
- Maintaining confidentiality of unpublished research data and article and/or communications and/or patient and/or subject identity.
Handling of Complaints and Appeals
Complaints regarding editorial decisions, peer review conduct, or ethical concerns may be submitted in writing to the Editor-in-Chief at editorinchief@allbiosolution.com. Complaints are acknowledged within 10 business days and reviewed by a member of the editorial board not involved in the original decision, or by an independent external academic reviewer invited by the Editor-in-Chief or Co-Editor-in-Chief where such a conflict exists, to ensure fair and timely resolution. Authors may appeal a rejection decision in writing, stating the specific grounds for appeal; appeals are evaluated following COPE's guidance on appeals.
Handling of Research Misconduct Allegations
Allegations of misconduct, including data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, or image manipulation, are investigated by the editorial board following COPE's flowcharts for suspected misconduct. Where warranted, the corresponding author's institution may be contacted. Depending on the outcome of the investigation, the journal may issue a correction, expression of concern, or retraction.
Conflicts of Interest
Authors, editors, and reviewers must disclose any financial, personal, or professional interests that could influence the work or its evaluation. Undisclosed conflicts may lead to rejection or retraction.
Data Sharing and Reproducibility
Authors are encouraged to share supporting data and materials, promoting reproducibility. Data availability statements are required where applicable.
Ethical Oversight
Research must comply with relevant ethical standards. Human and animal studies require approval from appropriate ethics committees or institutional review boards, and this approval must be cited in the manuscript.
Intellectual Property and Third-Party Content
Authors must give proper attribution for all third-party content and obtain permission for any copyrighted material used.
Copyright and Licensing
Journal of Allbiosolution does not charge Article Processing Charges (APCs) or subscription fees. All published articles are freely available to read, download, and share.
Authors retain copyright of their published work, which is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This license applies to all articles published in the journal, past and present.
Post-Publication Discussion, Corrections, and Retractions
The journal supports post-publication comments, corrections, and updates to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the scholarly record. Errata, corrigenda, or retractions will be issued as necessary, following COPE's retraction guidelines.
Plagiarism Screening
All submissions are screened for textual similarity using iThenticate prior to peer review. Suspected cases of plagiarism or citation manipulation are handled per the Research Misconduct procedure above.
Use of Generative AI
Authors may use generative AI tools only to support language editing or minor improvements, and such use must be transparently acknowledged in the manuscript. AI tools cannot be listed as authors, and full responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of the work remains with the human contributors. Any misuse, including fabricated text, data, or references, will be treated as a breach of publication ethics and may result in rejection or retraction.
Editors and reviewers are likewise expected to use generative AI responsibly, ensuring confidentiality, transparency, and originality in their evaluations, and must not rely on AI tools in ways that compromise the integrity of the peer review process.
General
No acceptance of any other kind of unethical behavior not explicitly listed above.