The following peer review procedure applies to all manuscripts submitted to Journal of Allbiosolution:
1. Initial Editorial Screening
At the initial stage, the editor and/or editorial members evaluate the submitted manuscript and prepare a brief report based on the journal's aim and scope, originality of the work, scientific soundness, and English language quality. Based on this initial evaluation, the editor decides whether to accept, reject, or request revisions prior to sending the manuscript to reviewers. This initial screening typically takes 3 to 10 days.
2. Peer Review
Manuscripts that pass initial screening are evaluated through a three-stage review: an assessment by the Editor-in-Chief, evaluation by one member of the editorial board, and review by one independent external reviewer. Reviewers who declare no conflicts of interest submit their reports after evaluating the manuscript according to the criteria outlined on this page, including journal standards, author responsibilities, and publication ethics, as well as any recommendations from the editor.
This journal follows a double-blind peer review policy: reviewer and author identities remain concealed from one another throughout the review process.
Authors may suggest potential reviewers at the time of submission and may request the exclusion of specific individuals due to a conflict of interest; the editor retains full discretion over final reviewer selection.
3. Review Timeline
The review process duration depends on reviewer availability, manuscript complexity, and the number of revision rounds required. As a general guide, full peer review, from reviewer invitation to first decision, typically takes 15 days to 8 weeks. Manuscripts requiring revision will take additional time for authors to respond and for reviewers to re-evaluate.
4. Editorial Decision
Based on reviewer reports, the editor decides to accept, reject, or request revisions, or may send the manuscript to additional reviewers for further evaluation. The editor's decision is final.
5. Post-Publication Transparency
With reviewer consent, the names of reviewers and editors involved in the peer review process may be acknowledged in the final published article. For accepted and published articles, reviewer reports, editor recommendations, and corresponding author responses may be published alongside the article at the editor's discretion, with reviewer consent. Manuscripts under review, and all related communications for rejected submissions, remain confidential in accordance with the journal's Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement.